the origins of language Essays -- essays research papers

Knowing a language delegacy one can speak, be understood and understand others who know the language. Although I have interpreted three years of Spanish, I would non theorise that I definitively know Spanish. I would not feel comfortable going to Spain alone and trying to resist merely with the three years training that I received. I would inevitably make mistakes, conjugating verbs improperly or stringing nonsensical sentences together. Knowing a language means knowing the things that you aren?t taught. I could spend five more years in a Spanish class, learning all the rules and vocabulary, but I hitherto would not feel I knew the language. Knowing the language means understanding the inarticulate rules derriere that language. It is in understanding what is possible and, conversely, what is impossible in a language that one can truly know that language. Logically it follows then to ask if this unspoken knowledge is not taught, how is it lettered? Prior to the lecture on lan guage competence I would have said, purely from an observational standpoint, that those rules of language are learned chiefly through imitation. A child hears what his or her parents say and mimics them. Through correction and over time, these rules are then conditioned into that child. When asked, however, how do you explain the occurrence that children do not make random mistakes, but instead predictable ones, this theory begins to break down. Allotting sole propriety to ... the origins of language Essays -- essays research papers Knowing a language means one can speak, be understood and understand others who know the language. Although I have taken three years of Spanish, I would not say that I definitively know Spanish. I would not feel comfortable going to Spain alone and trying to survive merely with the three years training that I received. I would inevitably make mistakes, conjugating verbs improperly or stringing nonsensical sentences together. Knowing a l anguage means knowing the things that you aren?t taught. I could spend five more years in a Spanish class, learning all the rules and vocabulary, but I still would not feel I knew the language. Knowing the language means understanding the unspoken rules behind that language. It is in understanding what is possible and, conversely, what is impossible in a language that one can truly know that language. Logically it follows then to ask if this unspoken knowledge is not taught, how is it learned? Prior to the lecture on language competence I would have said, purely from an observational standpoint, that those rules of language are learned chiefly through imitation. A child hears what his or her parents say and mimics them. Through correction and over time, these rules are then conditioned into that child. When asked, however, how do you explain the fact that children do not make random mistakes, but rather predictable ones, this theory begins to break down. Allotting sole propriety to ...