Child Labour in the Industrial Revolution | Essay

youngster lug in the industrial Revolution EssayNardinelli (1980 pp.739-55) argues, wayward to popular opinion, that the employment of nestlingren in the early industrial Revolution was not ceased by the Factory Acts of 18331 and 18442, just rather that the Factory Acts simply speeded up a figure out that was already underway, in terms of technical changes and increases in family incomes, which meant that child labour was no longer necessary (Nardinelli, 1980 p.739). Using data from school document rates, Nardinelli (1980 p. 751) shows that, following the introduction of the Factory Acts, no difference betwixt school enrolment rates existed between the textile districts and the rest of the country. Nardinelli (1980 p.755) concludes that the textile industry, which used child labour, was only one of the industries that form the industrial Revolution, and, indeed, was intimately the only industry to use child labour, and that, as much(prenominal)(prenominal), the erupt of c hild labour and its role in the success of the Industrial Revolution is diminished.Verdon (2002 pp.299-323) also discusses child labour, in rural aras, and its relation to womens employment, family income and the 1834 sad Law Report. As Verdon (2002 p.299) argues, it is important to take a regional approach to studies of the Industrial Revolution, and its effect on the lives of children throughout the ordinal coulomb, as child labour levels, family incomes and social class relations varied wide from region to region during the clipping of the Industrial Revolution. Verdon (2002, p.322) concludes that region, gender and age were all key determinants of labourers experience of be keep up in nineteenth century rural areas, with children contributing a substantial proportion of the kin income in 1834, across every region. At this measure, in that respectfore, rural child labour was an important source of childhood income. How this was moved(p) by the introduction of Factory Ac ts (which, of course, would not directly baffle fixed rural employment, outside of urban factories) is not discussed.Horrell and Humphries (1995 pp. 485-516) look at child labour and the family economy during the Industrial Revolution, using data from kinsperson budgets of this catamenia, and found that during the period of early industrialisation, the number of children working and the number of children working in factories increased, and the age at which children started work decreased, due to the fact that older children became economically in subject from families at an early age, thus exit younger siblings to work to increase the household income. Horrell and Humphries (1995 p. 510) conclude that, indeed, during the early Industrial Revolution, small children were exploited, in that in that respect was an enormous growth in the employment of children in factories during this period. Horrell and Humphries (1995 p. 511) show, supplementing the work of Verdon (2002), that there was an intensification of child employment in the factory districts during the early Industrial Revolution and that this was in stark contrast to the under- and unemployment of children in the rural sulfur East during the afterward Industrial Revolution. In contrast to Nardinelli (1980), Horrell and Humphries (1995 p. 511) conclude that the Factory Acts did have the effect of reducing childrens employment in factories, but that this doesnt seem to have had whatsoever effect on the numbers of children within families who were expected to work, and that legislation.whitethorn have dis smudged more girls than boys, who then, it is hypothesised, moved into domestic service, for example, thus rest in employment.Horn (1974 pp.779-796) looks at child workers in the pillow lace and straw plait trades in Buckinghamshire and Bedfordshire, stating that the cottage industries in the regions outside of the urban centres of the Industrial Revolution (i.e., the towns across Lancashire ) provided employment for many womanly workers, who, otherwisewise, would have been employed in domestic service. Thus, again, a regional view of child labour during the Industrial Revolution proves important, as this work of Horn (1974) essentially goes against the conclusions of Horrell and Humphries (1995). Horn (1974 p.795) concludes that cottage industries, such(prenominal) as these twain industries, gave much- necessary supplement to the household incomes of working-class families in these counties, and that similar cottage industries in other rural areas mustiness have had the same effect too. Horn (1974 p. 795) notes that the general education of the children (who worked in the cottage industries) was neglected and the contiguous section depart look in further detail at how the education of children changed during the period of the Industrial Revolution.Johnson (1970 pp.96-119) looks at educational policy and social control in early Victorian England, showing that educ ating the hapless seemed to be one of the strongest of early Victorian obsessions, with concern for education figuring largely, for example, as we have seen, in the Factory Act of 1833, and with private institutions, such as the National Society, launching many educational projects during the period 1838 and 1843 (Johnson p.97). Johnson (1979 p.119) concludes, essentially, however, that the concern for educating the poor as expressed by early Victorian regimes was more intimately overbearing the working class population than it was about providing opportunity for the working classes, although issues surrounding what he terms the educational problem of this time were hotly debated3.Reay (1991 pp.89-129) looks at the context and meaning of popular literacy in nineteenth century rural England, and shows that functional analyses of literacy tell weensy about the unquestionable educational introduce of people livelihood and working during the Industrial Revolution (Reay, 1991 p.1 28) as recorded declines in illiteracy amongst rural child workers, for example, lots reflect the acquisition of a new skill, such as writing, rather than a shift towards beat literacy. Analyses of signatures and marks are also not particularly useful, argues Reay (1991 p.129) as these endure tell us little about the actual literacy level of the signatory, especially, as he argues, for much of the nineteenth century population, reading equalled literacy, in its correct cultural context, such that the ability to sign ones name is, actually, one of the to the lowest degree interesting aspects of literacy (Reay 1991 p.129).Snell (1999 pp.122-168) looks at the role Sunday Schools played in the education of working class child labourers during the Industrial Revolution, and shows that Sunday Schools were widespread around both the urban centres of the Industrial Revolution and across the face regions, and that Sunday Schools, essentially, through a religious educational policy, taug ht many nineteenth century child labourers the measure out of education, and also about civic responsibility, although often, as Snell (1999 p. 168) notes, clerical control was strict and the syllabus narrow, such that, much as Johnson (1979) argued, at this time, education for working class child labourers was as much about social control as it was about providing opportunity to this section of the population.Thompsons (1981) piece looks at the issue of social control in Victorian Britain, arguing that social order in Britain was subject to strains enforce by the dual wreakes of urbanisation and industrialisation (Thompson, 1981 p.189), arguing that social control led to social geological fault in Victorian society, throughout the course of the Industrial Revolution, not through legal systems, police forces and the flagellum of prisons, but through social control (Thompson, 1981 p.207) exercised from within each social class almost as an internal thermostat of order, with soci al organisms such as community being important in defining, adapting and cause popular culture (Thompson, 1981 p.208). This social control also included controls over relaxation and pleasure, with football, social clubs and symphony halls arising as a way in which the working classes could find release from their daily grind (Thompson, 1981 p.208). endingThis paper has looked at the issues of child labour, home life (in terms of household incomes and household demographics), and education in nineteenth century Britain, showing that successive changes in legislature provided better working breaks for child labourers during the nineteenth century, and that these changes in legislature meant that children were, at least to some extent, better educated towards the end of the period of the Industrial Revolution than they had been at the beginning of this period of history. This education, which, although, as we have seen, seemed to have been designed with the explicit goal of exertin g social control, did push forward some changes to child labour, in terms of shifting work from full-time to half-time, and, as we have seen, shifting the demographics of work, with younger children entering work in order to provide auxiliary household income, as the older children of the household, during this period, had a tendency to become independent more quickly, leaving the household to enter in to domestic service, for example, which left a hole in the households purses, which needed to be filled. upbringing, during the nineteenth century was formulated through the Education Act of 1870, and was provided both by government institutions, as we have seen, and also private and religious organisations, through the Sunday School ne 2rk, for example. As suggested, there is, perhaps, no consistent way in which to measure the effect of schooling on the literacy levels at the time, overlook to say that perhaps more children were able to write. It is sack, from the reviews of the articles presented here, that the working class developed as a clear cultural phenomenon, with social control coming from within this class, as a response to community expectations of behaviour. Thus, in sum, child labour was prevalent throughout the nineteenth century, across Industrial Britain (i.e., both in the urban centres and in rural areas) but this labour was, towards the end of the century, better regulated, in conjunction with increasing educational opportunities and standards, which led to the rise of a clear, self-controlling, working class.BibliographyGordon Baker, The Romantic and Radical nature of the 1870 Education Act, History of Education, 30,3 (2001), pp.211-232Pamela Horn, Child Workers in the pillow lace and straw plait trades of Victorian Buckinghamshire and Bedfordshire, Historical Journal, 17 (1974), pp.779-96S.Horrell Jane Humphries, The Exploitation of little children Child Labour and the family economy in the Industrial Revolution Explorations in Economi c History, 32 (1995), pp.485-516Richard Johnson, Education Policy and Social crack in Early Victorian England, Past and Present, 49 (1970), pp.96-119Clark Nardinelli, Child Labour and the Factory Acts, Journal of Economic History, 40 (1980), PP.739-55Barry Reary, The Context and Meaning of popular Literacy Some Evidence from Nineteenth-Century hobnailed Ireland, Past Present, 131(1991), pp.89-129K.D.M. Snell, The Sunday-School Movement in England and Wales Child Labour, Denominational Control and Working-Class Culture, Past Present, 164 (1999), pp.122-16F.M.L Thompson, Social Control in Victorian Britain, Economic History Review, 34,2 (1981) pp.189-208Nicola Verdon, The rural labour market in the early nineteenth century womens and childrens employment,family income, and the 1834 Poor Law Report, Economic History Review, LV,2 (2002),PP.299-323Footnotes1 which limited the employment of children to children over nine eld of age (see Nardinelli, 1980).2 which established the half- time system, whereby children worked half-day and went to school half-day (see Nardinelli, 1980)3 Baker (2001 pp.211-232), for example, takes Johnsons (1970) work further, and looks in detail at the 1870 Education Act and the consequences of this Act, in terms of what he terms the distribution of life chances (Baker p.211).Memory integrating and Re consolidation Drug habituationMemory Consolidation and Reconsolidation Drug AddictionMemory Consolidation and Reconsolidation Implications for Drug AddictionJayan SamarakoonAbstractThis paper looks at the current friendship and debate surrounding retention reconsolidation. After a brief overview of consolidation and reconsolidation including the associated theories of each process the paper delved into the literature surrounding reconsolidation and critically evaluated research articles which both reinforced or shed doubt onto the physiological mechanisms of reconsolidation. The paper then discussed possible applications of this kno wledge in the discussion of dose addiction, in particular the efficacy of blocking NDMA sensory receptors to disrupt reconsolidation. Guidelines for future research concerning serviceman trials were outlined.Memory Consolidation and Reconsolidation Implications for Drug AddictionMemories affect human beings behaviour (Nader Einarsson, 2010). An understanding of how memories are formed would give insight into the mechanisms that underlie behaviour. This paper will look at the physiological processes that affect memories such as consolidation and reconsolidation in particular the current knowledge and debate surrounding these remembering processes. The paper will then delve into how this knowledge could affect psychology, in particular the realm of drug addiction. This will be done by critically evaluating the current literature and outlining areas for future research.Memories are believed to be primed(p) in the synapses between neurons of the brain (Nader Einarsson, 2010). New memories change the strength of the synapse which subjects in an adjustment of the unique(predicate) retentivity (Clopath, 2012). Memory is categorised into two forms, compendious-term and long shop. The difference between the two is a process called consolidation which affects information stored in long-term stock via strengthening the neuron pathways affected by the stock called the computer storage trace (Nader Einarsson, 2010). Consolidation is the process of stabilizing a memory trace afterwards the initial behavioural experience (Dubnau Chiang, 2013). Many different studies have found that several types of tour of duty such as inhibiting protein deductive reasoning, disrupting the function of limited proteins, and brain lesions or trauma back disrupt the process of consolidation (Alberini, 2011). These studies have formed the basis of understanding the different consolidation simulates. Consolidation consists of two distinct processes, synaptic consolidati on and system consolidation (Clopath, 2012). Synaptic consolidation involves iterate stimulation of a neuron called long-term potentiation, which results in stable changes at the synapse over time while systems consolidation is a process where memories that are subject of the genus Hippocampus become independent and move to a separate brain region.Synapses can vary in strength, which is referred to as p runicity (Clopath, 2012). A change in synaptic plasticity can be a short-term change which lasts a few minutes to a long-term change which can last up to a life-time. A long-term change in plasticity is the basic definition of synaptic consolidation. This process allows memory to be consolidation within a single synapse, which cannot be altered by any new memories (Clopath, 2012). Synaptic consolidation usually occurs within the first few minutes to hours after the memory encoding has happened (Dudai, 2004).The physiological conditions that cause synaptic consolidation involve many different processes which result in a physical change of the synapse (Dubnau Chiang, 2013). They include modification and reorganisation of the synapse protein including the membrane receptors. Intracellular signalling proteins such as cAMP and MAPK are recruited to activate cellular remodelling and growth during synaptic consolidation (Dudai, 2004).The standard model of system consolidation posits that memory is dependent on the location of the encoding in the mediotemporal lobe (Dubnau Chiang, 2013). Initial memories are formed in the hippocampus via synaptic consolidation and then over a period of weeks or more the memory trace reorganises so that the retention is maintained by the neocortex and is not dependent on the hippocampus anymore (Dudai, 2004). There are some criticisms with this model of systems consolidation. For starters only declarative memory is processed by the hippocampus and as such this model cannot apply to non-declarative memory. An alternative view is call ed quintuple trace theory. Multiple trace theory proposes that the hippocampus region is always involved in the retention and retrieval of episodic memories and that semantic memory follows the standard model of system consolidation (Dubnau Chiang, 2013).These models of consolidation wear thin that the process of consolidation occurs just once. This assumption is currently undergoing some criticism and debate on whether it is binding or not. Research has shown that the retrieval of a memory trace can induce a level where the memory is malleable to change (Tronson Taylor, 2007). superstar paper proposed that memory was a dynamic process with two different says, an active state where memories both new and reactivated are labile to change and an inactive state where the memories stabilise over time (Nader Einarsson, 2010). Memory reconsolidation is induced by the re activating of a specific memory (Reichelt Lee, 2013). This reactivation process causes the memory trace to beco me destabilised into a labile state, a state where the memory pathway can be changed. The process to return the destabilised memory into a stable form is called reconsolidation and is dependent on protein deduction (Reichelt Lee, 2013). Destabilisation occurs when L-type voltage-gated calcium channels and cannabinoid CB1 receptors are activated, along with synaptic protein degradation in the dorsal hippocampus (Reichelt Lee, 2013).A try out examined if it was possible to reactivate a consolidated memory into a labile state and introduce new information (Forcato, Rodrguez, Pedreira, Maldonado, 2010). Participants were asked to learn an association between five cue-syllables and their respective response-syllables. 24 hours later the memory was reactivated and the subjects were given additional information, in this case three extra syllable pairs. The participants were tested on their knowledge the third day. The results showed that the new information was successfully incorporat ed into the former memory since both sets of syllables were successfully retained in memory when the instruction stated to add the new information to the old memory, contrary the condition where the instruction was omitted. This condition showed evidence that the two sets of information were encoded independently from each other due to interference in retrieval. The larn used a verbal reminder (briefly mentioned the previous pairs) to try and trigger reconsolidation. They did not asses if retrieval of the memory actually occurred. One method of bypassing the requirement of assessing if memory retrieval occurred is to design an sample where the process of memory reconsolidation is interrupted, which should impair memory retrieval at a later date. A study conducted in 2010 successfully demonstrated that if the reactivation of a memory is followed by an emotionally aversive stimulus results in impairment when recalled at a later date (Strange, Kroes, Fan, Dolan, 2010). This study gives evidence that memories can be impair following their retrieval.Reconsolidation has been found to occur not just in humans but in other animals as well (Robinson Franklin, 2010). A Considerable amount of research exists which indicates that when an animal is reminded of a previously intimate experience the memory of that experience undergoes reconsolidation. This is supported by findings which show that treatment with a protein synthesis inhibitor like a shot after re-exposing the experience can produce amnesia of the memory itself, due to the fact that recalling a memory triggers reconsolidation which requires the production of new proteins (Cai, Pearce, Chen, Glanzman, 2012). One study looked at how the amnestic drugs propranolol and midazolam would affect reconsolidation in rats (Robinson Franklin, 2010). They did this by exposing the rats to a box which contained both morphine and a saline solution in separate areas. The rats were receptive to this apparatus either f our or eight times depending on the experimental condition. Afterwards the rats real either no superman, or an injection of an amnestic drug. The rats were retested two and s evening days after the dosage in the four pairings condition and with the eight pairings condition they were tested eight times in 48 hour blocks. The result showed that the amnestic drugs disrupted reconsolidation for weak memories (four pairings condition) and had little effect for strong memories (eight pairings condition).A study conducted by Cammarota, et al. (2009), examined if reconsolidation would occur in an restrictive avoidance task using rats. The rats were trained in an inhibitory avoidance task and 24 hours later were exposed to the task again. After the exposure the rats were injected with a protein synthesis inhibitor and tested on the avoidance task for the third time. The results revealed that the protein synthesis inhibitor had no effect on memory retention. If reconsolidation had occurred there would have been a change in memory retention. This study used a short time period to measure reconsolidation.In the study conducted by Robinson Franklin (2010), there was evidence that reconsolidation had occurred yet in the study by Cammarota, et al. (2009), there was no evidence of memory reconsolidation occurring. There are two study differences between the two studies which whitethorn shed light into the discrepancy regarding the results. The study which showed reconsolidation used many repeated exposures to the memory stimulus and measured the possible effects of reconsolidation over a period of two weeks (Robinson Franklin, 2010), unlike the other study which only had two training sessions (as opposed to four or eight) and tested for any reconsolidation effects within 24 hours of the last training session (Cammarota, Bevilaqua, Medina, Izquierdo, 2009). These findings show evidence that memory reconsolidation may only occur in specific instances, with the two studie s giving evidence that training strength and time may be two factors which affect reconsolidation. Research into finding the prerequisites of reconsolidation would be beneficial.One study looked at the limitations or boundaries of memory reconsolidation (Wang, De Oliveira Alvares, Nader, 2009). In the study Wang, et al. (2009) looked at the effects of strong training on fear-associated memory and reconsolidation. The data suggested that when 10 pairings were used instead of one the memory did not undergo reconsolidation until after cardinal days have passed. By looking at the molecular mechanisms the researchers found that certain NDMA receptor subunits have to be stimulated in the BLA during reactivation of the memory to begin reconsolidation. They found that strong training could inhibit the activation of the NR2B receptor subunit which resulted in the fear stimulus not triggering reconsolidation. These results suggest that even though reconsolidation exists there are certain pr erequisites that have to be met to start the process, such as the strength of the training and the time that has elapsed since encoding. These limitations may be the reason why some studies have not found a reconsolidation effect.These research articles show that reconsolidation is an actual process of memory. Reconsolidation can be the mechanism which enables our memories to be modified or updated since the memory that undergoes the process is activated often in situations which present additional complementary information (Lee, 2009). Since old, well-established memories can undergo reconsolidation there exists the possibility to exploit the destabilisation of the memory and either disrupt or even erase it completely (Milton Everitt, 2010). Therefore reconsolidation could be seen as an adaptive technique which can potentially affect or guide future behaviour. This has many potential applications. Many psychiatric disorders are due to underlie aberrant memories, such as drug addi ction (Milton Everitt, 2010). Drug addiction is a chronic and reverting disorder whereby the main risk of relapse comes from the presentation of environmental cues which have been previously associated with harmful drug use (Font Cunningham, 2012). These cues are memories which can possibly be targeted and changed by memory reconsolidation to influence future behaviour.One study looked at reconsolidation and alcohol dependence in mice (Font Cunningham, 2012). The mice were trained with either a strong or weak conditioning process. The animals were then given an injection of propranolol, a receptor obstructionist and tested for memory consolidation a day later. The test found that memory retention was not affected by the antagonist. The study examined the effects of propranolol after the reactivation of the memory therefore the antagonist was introduced after reconsolidation had started. A study that looks at the effects of an antagonist that has been introduced before reconsolid ation has started may yield different results.One study looked at drug-associated memories and their kin with amygdala NMDA receptors (Milton, Lee, Butler, Gardner, Everitt, 2009). They hypothesised that NMDA receptors in particular glutamate receptors within the amygdala are crucial for the consolidation between environmental well-read stimuli and the effects of addictive drugs, therefore the NMDA receptors must be crucial for the reconsolidation of drug-associated memories (Milton, et al., 2009). The study used a behavioural task that measures the conditioned reinforcing properties of a drug-paired stimulus by first exposing the stimulus, then injecting a NMDA receptor antagonist before a memory reactivation session. They found that the antagonist disrupted drug-associated memory and decreased the conditioned reinforcement effect. This effect lasted four weeks which was the length of the experiment. Although there was a link found when the receptor antagonist was injected befor e the reactivation session there was no difference when the drug was introduced after the session which indicates that the receptor may only have a limited role in reconsolidation. These results suggest that controlling the glutamate levels at the NMDA receptor may be useful in preventing relapses although further research has to be done, particularly on the actual effect of NDMA receptors on reconsolidation and the length this effect lasts for.In summary the current knowledge of reconsolidation is quite sufficient to have an impact in mental applications such as treating drug addiction. Knowledge about the specific physiological mechanisms of reconsolidation from animal studies is a good foundation to advance towards human experiments. Further research into the specific physiological mechanisms which underlie reconsolidation would help create effective treatment plans as would moving from animal studies to human trials.ReferencesAlberini, C. M. (2011). The role of reconsolidation and the dynamic process of long-term memory formation and storage. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 5, 12. inside10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00012Cai, D., Pearce, K., Chen, S., Glanzman, DavidL. (2012). Reconsolidation of long-term memory in Aplysia. Current Biology, 22(19), 1783-1788. inside10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.038Cammarota, M., Bevilaqua, L. R. M., Medina, J. H., Izquierdo, I. (2009). Retrieval does not induce reconsolidation of inhibitory avoidance memory. culture Memory, 11(5), 572-578. doi10.1101/lm.76804Clopath, C. (2012). Synaptic consolidation an approach to long-term learning. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 6(3), 251-257. doi10.1007/s11571-011-9177-6Dubnau, J., Chiang, A.-S. (2013). Systems memory consolidation in Drosophila. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 23(1), 84-91. doi10.1016/j.conb.2012.09.006Dudai, Y. (2004). The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 51-86. doi10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142050Font, L., Cunningham, C. L. (2012). Post-retrieval propranolol treatment does not modulate reconsolidation or extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 101(2), 222-230. doi10.1016/j.pbb.2012.01.009Forcato, C., Rodrguez, M. L. C., Pedreira, M. E., Maldonado, H. (2010). Reconsolidation in humans opens up declarative memory to the entrance of new information. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 93(1), 77-84. doi10.1016/j.nlm.2009.08.006Lee, J. L. C. (2009). Reconsolidation maintaining memory relevance. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(8), 413-420. doi10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.002Milton, A. L., Everitt, B. J. (2010). The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation implications for the treatment of addiction. The European journal of neuroscience, 31(12), 2308. doi10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07249.xMilton, A. L., Lee, J. L., Butler, V. J., Gardner, R., Everitt, B. J. (2009). Intra-amygdala and systemic antagonism of N MDA receptors prevents the reconsolidation of drug-associated memory and impairs subsequently both novel and previously acquired drug-seeking behaviors. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(33), 8230-8237. doi 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1723-08.2008Nader, K., Einarsson, E. . (2010). Memory reconsolidation an update. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191(1), 27-41. doi10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05443.xReichelt, A. C., Lee, J. L. C. (2013). Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 7, 118. doi 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00118.Robinson, M. J. F., Franklin, K. B. J. (2010). Reconsolidation of a morphine place preference Impact of the strength and age of memory on disruption by propranolol and midazolam. Behavioural oral sex Research, 213(2), 201-207. doi10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.056Strange, B. A., Kroes, M. C. W., Fan, J. E., Dolan, R. J. (2010). Emotion causes targeted forgetting of established memories. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 4, 175. doi10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00175Tronson, N. C., Taylor, J. R. (2007). Molecular mechanisms of memory reconsolidation. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 8(4), 262-275. doi10.1038/nrn2090Wang, S.-h., De Oliveira Alvares, L., Nader, K. (2009). Cellular and systems mechanisms of memory strength as a constraint on auditory fear reconsolidation. Nature Neuroscience, 12(7), 905-912. doi10.1038/nn.2350