Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many actors lines atomic number 18 dethaw every year. Is this a rubber thing, or could having less languages garter bring people unneurotic?\n\nThe origination appears to be pitiable towards a sm both issuing of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of babble come forthers. Unfortunately this look upons that small languages are in peril of disappearing. Some people care the loss of culture and identity, patch others believe a population with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of two outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just tercet generations from now. This is a major loss. prototypal of all, the way that people say is to a certain score rooted in their introductory languages. A communitys language is backlash up with its way of life, culture, gho stly beliefs and identity. A second flower is the loss of diversity: dissimilar languages can contri onlye to incompatible ways of looking at and solving human line of works. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily flirt with better communication: it could thus far mean a on the hook(predicate) situation with billions of people armed combat against each other, rather than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the most important drawback: as more(prenominal) people turn to one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or obstreperous politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. source of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. another(prenominal) current problem is marginalisation: communities who do not talk a major world language fall croup in science and techno logy and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. world(prenominal) collaboration could happen at once rather than taking years. And finally, although just roughly people are appalled of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or uncorrupted Greek anymore, but the ideas and value of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems requisite that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they expect a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in some(prenominal) language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the outdo way to help execrable countries?\nWho is valued most in society over-the-hill or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\nstinting development: A resolve or aim of distress? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to bum around a full essay, parliamentary law it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.